So heres the situation. Our office is currently marketing a first class full
service nationally franchised suburban hotel, in fine condition, with wonderful meeting
facilities and good expansion space. Its in a solid, business friendly, location
with good upside potential in both rate and occupancy. The propertys room sales have
improved over 20 % in the past two years and income is continuing to increase monthly. One
of Americas major communications corporations just broke ground on a significant
expansion of its corporate headquarters just a couple of miles away, which is sure to
increase corporate travel.
Sounds like a deal that should sell over the phone at a 10 ½ cap
rate, right ? Well, in the marketplace of late 1996, would you believe were hearing
numerous major REIT buyers saying, "Look, were seeking a 13% cap rate after 8 %
set aside for management fees and replacement reserve." Of course, those "going
in" caps on current cash flow are pretty high, and a seller would have to be quite
desperate to sell a good property at that cap rate level, so whats really going on ?
I believe the answer is simple. The hotel equities market is turning bearish, and that
means a distinct slowdown in the pace of selling activity, as spreads again widen between
the seller and buyer perceptions of value.
Buyers generally value properties based on a combination of current cash flow plus
their guesstimate of annualized equity build-up available in the deal. They generally try
to "kid themselves" into pre-tax equity returns in the range of 17 to 20 %. So,
when someone tells you theyre looking for a 13 % cap rate, youre dealing with
a pessimist as regards the near term upside valuation potential of hotels. After all, a
buyers belief that the future upside is diminishing naturally causes him to
compensate for reduced upside by seeking higher going-in cash on cash yields.
In the early 1990s, when existing hotel cash flows were almost universally lower
than today, we were in the beginning stages of a national economic recovery. New hotel
development wasnt proceeding at the expanded pace that it is today. Then, buyers
accepted lower current cash flow returns because they saw significant future upside
potential. Its a piece of cake to have what came to be called "an exit
strategy" so long as tomorrows value is greater than todays. However,
thats no longer the case in many peoples minds. The market evidently believes
that those times are clearly behind us, even as 1996s hotel industry profits
temporarily rise to new heights.
New hotel development in many markets will, in the near future, obviously cause
billions of dollars in lost market value equity for existing hotel property owners. Just
as apparent is that the new developments being built will often result in unexpected years
of headaches and acid indigestion for those happily optimistic developers who, foolishly,
believe the pro formas theyre either creating or being fed. Basically, whats
at work is simply the old maxim that builders will build when lenders will lendand,
boy, are the lenders, builders and franchisers having fun today ! Now, lets remember that
all this is occurring in the latter stages of an economic recovery when a likely upward
bump in interest rates usually takes place and adds to the damping down of the economy and
a reduced pace of business expansion.
So, we end where we began. But, I still think that when a buyer tells you hes
looking for an acquisition cap rate target of 13 % , after an 8% set aside for management
and replacement reserve, what hes really telling you is that hes decided to
"sit on his assets," because hell not be a player in todays market
when it comes to buying a good piece of real estate. There are simply too many optimists
still out there.